Tuesday, 3 February 2015

POLITICAL ART IN A MUSEUM OR ON THE STREET?


I personally think presenting art work from protests is a positive thing I believe that it does not de-politizes the events instead it makes people more consciously aware of the struggles that people had faced. It teaches people about history in general and where certain trends and ideas began or originated. I sometimes feel we blindly follow protests without understanding what it means to really fight for a cause. These exhibitions can in away make us feel fortunate and thankful that we do not have to face such hardships. It works as a timeless relic that brings together people of all backgrounds to witness protesting in a more reflective state, making people understand the purpose of artistic activism.  Some People do not engage in activism because of fear but in this open atmosphere you don’t have to be afraid you can stand and admire bravely, dedication and public participation.  

The aim of political art is to challenge and change the world in terms of social injustice  therefore critics could argue that exhibiting such worlds in a gallery is taking away its function because political art should act within the world not represent it. Having said this, the success of political art is being able to make people think, making them ask questions as opposed to just being presented with answers by presenting them within this space it gives people time to question actions instead of being biased. I think the exhibition was really fascinating because it showed protest all over the world. 

No comments:

Post a Comment